ivanasksyou: lawcollegiette:icanfuckthescalenetriangle: obvs correct answer is to be great scienti
ivanasksyou: lawcollegiette: icanfuckthescalenetriangle: obvs correct answer is to be great scientist, marry great scientist, raise six great scientists. thats 8 fuckin scientists yo thats like extra sciencey ^ YEP And friendly reminder that Nobel Prize laureate scientist Marie Curie married Pierre Curie (a physicist) and then gave birth to and raised Irene Joliot Curie, who would then grew up to be a Nobel Prize laureate just like her mother. @ Wife With A Purpose: stop talking like women cannot be scientists and mothers of scientist(s) at the same time, you fool. because mothers are automatically a role model, being a great scientist actually increases the chance of your children becoming great scientists Except almost half of women, especially professional women in STEM fields, between the ages of 15 and 55 do not have children citing reasons such as “wanting to have a career” or “the cost of raising a child (as single parent…because of course, you are supposed to get pregnant out of wedlock and raise a child yourself). Also, women’s happiness has been on steady decline since the 1950′s according to research. And it seems to be tied to women abandoning the traditional role of mother and primary caregiver. Seriously, it’s like you fags and Marxists don’t fact check your bullshit before posting it. -- source link