smitethestate:beemovieerotica:brendanicus:cisphobiccommunistopinions: understatedocelot: i don&rsquo
smitethestate:beemovieerotica:brendanicus:cisphobiccommunistopinions: understatedocelot: i don’t see the contradiction here. both headlines are factual summaries of the situation at hand. chinese parents have more reason for skepticism because they are getting the arguably sketchier chinese vaccine and under greater coercion. How is the Chinese vaccine “sketchier” and what “greater coercion” are they under It’s made by those inscrutable orientals practicing their Asiatic despotism how can it not be true science side:-the sinovac and sinopharm vaccines use conventional vaccine technology by introducing inactivated virus particles to the body to trigger an immune response-these types of vaccines can be stored at 2-8 degrees C and are easier to transport and distribute in poor countries for which industrial -80C freezers are not widely available -chinese vaccine producers have signed onto a global vaccine sharing org called Covax and have pledged to distribute 2 billion doses of their vaccines to poor countries in 2022-over 80 countries across Asia and Latin America are currently using sinopharm and/or sinovac after failing to gain access to the patented modern / pfizer brand vaccines As someone who writes headlines as part of my job, let me say the key differences in the two headlines (not to mention the subheader) are NUMEROUS and INTENTIONAL but I’m also impressed by how hard people are pretending not to notice the difference in the featured images. As though the screaming child in the one about China was not supposed to illicit a particular response vs. the utterly calm child in the one about the U.S., hello.But seriously. The implication that China is using child soldiers in a “war.” The emotion-inducing poetry of the second headline as opposed to the stale “FDA approves” headline. The framing of “kids might not be getting enough vaccination” vs. “kids might be UNSAFE from DANGEROUS CHINA VACCINE” – a framing which, ahem, clearly did its job with someone in this thread. -- source link