profeminist:“During the interview, the justice also affirmed a position she took on abortion d
profeminist:“During the interview, the justice also affirmed a position she took on abortion during her Clinton-era confirmation hearing, suggesting the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution was a better grounds for justifying abortion on demand than the “right to privacy.”“The basic thing is that the government has no business making that choice for a woman,” Ginsburg told the Times. In 1993, she told the Senate Judiciary Committee during her confirmation hearing: “(Y)ou asked me about my thinking on equal protection versus individual autonomy. My answer is that both are implicated. The decision whether or not to bear a child is central to a woman’s life, to her well-being and dignity. It is a decision she must make for herself. When the government controls that decision for her, she is being treated as less than a full adult human responsible for her own choices.” The Court legalized abortion under Roe v. Wade based on a “right to privacy” that it found in the 14th Amendment—and not the Equal Protection Clause. In doing so, it said the state had an interest in protecting the unborn child that increased as pregnancy progresses. Ginsburg’s position that women have an equal right to abortion as a result of their gender would appear to allow for no state restrictions on abortion.“SourceMore Notorious R.B.G. awesomenessReblogging for the woman who has been fighting for our rights for decades! THE NOTORIOUS SUPREME R.B.G!!! -- source link
#scotus#feminism#feminist#women's rights#pro choice#abortion#abortion rights#reproductive rights#reproductive choice