goldhornsandblackwool:thii2ii2tupiid:bad-vedma:vulvacrat:this is a straight couple. it’s straight. y
goldhornsandblackwool:thii2ii2tupiid:bad-vedma:vulvacrat:this is a straight couple. it’s straight. you’re in a heterosexual relationship. there is nothing remotely “queer” about this in the slightest whatsoever. jesus h christthis is the ‘straight looking’ couples shouldnt be allowed at pride thing all over again yall lol we arent gonna be able to move past this same line of discussion until we’re just a little bit slower on the draw to jump to conclusions. i did some cursory searching of her insta and while i dont know anything about her s/o in the pic and shes openly queer (though it looks like she did take down this pic presumably after getting heat for it)I say this all the time privately but the fact that a bunch of LGBT people make their sexual orientation THEIR IDENTITY makes them super defensive about who ‘gets to be’ queer and the fact that they always wanna try and tell who is and isn’t queer by looking at them is directly opposed to the fact that we simultaneously need being queer to be seen as normal. Every argument and article about how being LGBT is normal for a human falls on deaf ears when people are busy telling other people they’re not identifiably gay enough to be gay. I don’t think anyone realizes that further acceptance of LGBT identities means that what being LGBT ‘looks like’ will become vaguer and broader.All the understanding in the world of what it means to be closeted but if someone doesn’t read as ‘gay enough’ apparaently they must be 100% hetero in disguise. THe irony. -- source link