transgirlnezha:sawcleavers:transgirlnezha:sawcleavers:transgirlnezha:wait how is this trans exclusio
transgirlnezha:sawcleavers:transgirlnezha:sawcleavers:transgirlnezha:wait how is this trans exclusionary???? i mean there’s a bit of transmisogyny in it but???? this isn’t bad lmao this actually made me feel really good about myselfi got that kinda feel bc of their tags bein rlly excessive and not rlly making mention of twomen. if im off base here let me kno.i mean? they def come off as a clueless liberal with not much knowledge of trans issues but twerf dogwhistles are usually way more blatant and this doesn’t have any of themi mean i wouldnt call them a twef, but the first panel equating body hair on a woman to mean that they ‘look like a man’ kinda just strikes me… wrong, on top of the tagging convention… you kno? i dont think that was their intention, probably v clueless, yea, but the post puts a sour taste in my mouth.i mean yeah thats what i meant by the clueless liberal shiti mean, personally i think its p obvious that this is saying u shouldn’t tell girls that they “look like a man”, and that having body hair does not make you “manly”, which I’m hoping the author extends to trans girls too? i’d have to look at some of their other stuff to be surei think this is a very positive comic even for trans girls. the first panel is actually good, where it demonizes the comments of equating hairiness with manhood. this author was probably creating this comic from personal experience so i cant imagine why its wrong that she didnt make it specifically about trans girls if she isnt one. cis women are allowed to be hairy and upset for being made fun of for it -- source link
#rblg