ixnay-on-the-oddk:antifeministfox:BRUUUUUH Dress codes arent sexualized. For example, If a girl wear
ixnay-on-the-oddk:antifeministfox:BRUUUUUH Dress codes arent sexualized. For example, If a girl wears a skirt that goes above dress code rules, she cant blame the school or the imaginary patriarchy for it. Because she is Hypersexualizing herself.Your opinion of what is hypersexual operates on the belief that the upper thighs, shoulders, collarbones, etc on a young girl are sexual. You are the exact audience this post is meant for, someone who sexualizes young girl’s entirely non-sexual body parts, or bodies in general, since underage girls shouldn’t be sexually appealing to you if you’re an adult. People can absolutely blame schools for issuing a disproportionately strict dress code to girls, especially when their rationale is that these young girl’s bodies are a ‘distraction’ to boys & teachers. What this is suggesting to these girls is that their upper thighs, shoulders, etc are inherently so sexual that the boys & men around them are no longer capable of or expected to respect them, or be responsible for their own behavior/reactions, when that skin is visible. They’re learning that the onus, if they don’t want to be sexualized without their consent, is put on them to dress a certain way, cover up. That’s a pretty colossally confusing guilt trip for having body parts, one that can have profound impacts on someone’s self image at such a vulnerable age, one that is disproportionally put on girls. Stop the hypersexualization of young girls. -- source link