sorbet-queen:sighinastorm:overlord-flinx:diiizle:overlord-flinx:diiizle:earthshaker1217:mulxtto:over
sorbet-queen:sighinastorm:overlord-flinx:diiizle:overlord-flinx:diiizle:earthshaker1217:mulxtto:overlord-flinx:spoopy-ghoast:whyyoustabbedme:Reblog to make racists madHow did we get so paleEvaluation, selective breeding, deformities, inbreeding over centuries, lack of sun; I’m not a scientist, but there are a few guesses. Er… No, adaption, do you understsnd evolution? We’re generally lighter or darker depending on where we are on the hemisphere. Pale skinned people are better suited at producing vitamin D since they’re generally exposed to less direct sunlight, dark skinned people tend to be better protected from the sun since they’re generally exposed to more direct sunlight and thus don’t need to be able to produce more vitamin D. Dark skinned people can suffer from being in an environment without much direct sunlight due to their skin and pale skinned people can burn in the heat since they lack the protectio that dark skinned people have and absorb too much sun, even possibly giving them cancer.Neither are superior and neither are inferior, both better suited to the general environment they’re usually born in or their family come from.So shit like your idiotic reply is just perpeptuating racism and hatred and promoting people to consider people who are of a different race as lesser, grow up.True, but adaptation isn’t the only thing though especially when talking about human evolution. Because humans breed for other arbitrary reasons, the reasons mentioned before can also have an influence.Selective breeding is always a factor though because humans don’t like to breed with other humans that they deem unhealthy or with bad genes.Yeah but Micah’s point remains, selective breeding exists in all races, this person’s post was just attempting to be anti-white and dehumanizing of white people.I am partly white, first of all. Secondly, my assertion is that development happens for a multitude of reasons. A “deformities” in one time can over time develop into a necessity in a species’ survival. Which, as a species grows, migrates, or seeks out survival in a new biome, those alterations can seem more desirable for building a family with someone for. Thus one sort of person grows in a specific area while another prospers in another area. That’s just one aspect of evelution. That applies to humans as much as it does any other animal. I may have phrased it poorly and didn’t explain my point thoroughly enough, and I’m sorry for that. But be assured I have no ill feelings about any race of people. We all started from one centralized point, and our “differences” exist only as a product of our ansestrisl environments, as well as evolutions.Now we live in an unprecedented time where the borders and leaps between one area to the next can be covered in hours rather than years. Races are able to mix as easy as they are able to stay mainstream now.Just because you’re partly something doesn’t mean that what you say about that thing is automatically not an issue, if someone’s black and is making a comment that’s dehumanizing to black people, is that comment not dehumanizing on the basis that they’re black? Stop being ridiculous.I gave you the scientifically accepted explanation of why we go from dark to light and back again, your attempt at an explanation was misinformed, it’s as simple as that. No need for guess work.I suppose it’s however you choose to see it. I’ve clarified my point to the best I can to meet your understanding. How you choose to accept it is your own prerogative.What each of you contributed does not seem to be in conflict, on the whole. This is a very good non-argument! One point of vocabulary modification, though: “deformity” is not quite correct in this case. “Mutation” is the accurate word. Your phrasing was bound to set some people off, but I got what I think you meant.“People 10k years ago moved to a different environment and adapted to it due to natural selection!!!! Racists will b mad!!!”Its almost like one of the most accepted theories is that humanity originated in Africa YA THINK? Wild out here. Though emphasizing a simply “black” ethnic identity of Cheddar Man (what he’s called) tends to be, in the mind, racially anachronistic—pulling to mind modern sub-Saharan Africans, intentionally or not. I am surprised, admittedly, such a skin tone persisted in the north so long, and I would have guessed from previous readings a much earlier date range of the emergent phenotype. Wensleydale Man, by contrast to Cheddar Man, was almost certainly fair-skinned. (artist’s representations) Note the prominent brow, bulbous nose, and comparatively lesser cranial capacity. -- source link