deliciae-delectae: hisrachelle: This should be a common sight. Why not a leash law for women? A retu
deliciae-delectae: hisrachelle: This should be a common sight. Why not a leash law for women? A return to a male centric society with women in their natural place as property. After the Natural Order Party took power and the new laws were passed, women everywhere were reduced to chattel with no legal rights. The custom developed of keeping women leashed and naked, which served at least two functions: (1) the woman was reminded constantly that she was property and had the status of an animal, with any right to privacy a thing of the past; (2) tits, ass, and cunt were always on view for inspection and assessment, facilitating offers of sales or trades of cuntmeat by interested men. This gave each man a clearer sense of the market value of his property, and of its rate of depreciation over time. Moreover, the constant threat of sale to a potentially more cruel and vicious master hung over each women’s head like the sword of Damocles, boosting her eagerness to please. Most men agreed that this produced an altogether satisfactory state of affairs and spurred a significant improvement in female behavior. Cunts were usually wet and ready to use, as even women who had harbored feminist ideas found that their bodies betrayed them once they were taken in hand and given no choice. After this change in women’s demeanor became widely observed, emancipatory sentiment among men dwindled to the vanishing point. There would be no repeal of the new laws. -- source link