vagueversusvogue: sighinastorm: thecacklingcreep: moreprivilegedthanyou: thecacklingcreep: moreprivi
vagueversusvogue:sighinastorm:thecacklingcreep:moreprivilegedthanyou:thecacklingcreep:moreprivilegedthanyou:whensmahvelgoddamit:Anita Sarkeesian dropped the spaghettiAnita Sarkeesian dropped the spaghettiAnita Sarkeesian dropped the spaghettiAnita Sarkeesian dropped the spaghettiwiiu wiiu wiiu wiiu wiiu wiiu wiiu wiiu wiiu I’d like to see some sources on this tweet. But goddamn, if it’s true..Knew it was too good to be true. Segregationists are never straight-up with their intentions. https://twitter.com/femfreq/status/119507163545731072 Apparently it is true.MFWGod damn it. GOD DAMN IT. Are y’all gonna force me to be fair-minded to this carnival act? Am I the only one who can be? Am I the chosen one? TO BE FAIR: she is only saying she has read studies which claim that. Which is believable, given the socioeconomic division (itself an effect of an oppressed class with racial sorting pressure).I see your point and ignoring the fact that it is Anita I’d probably come to the same question eventually. I’d also ask for sources to aforementioned articles that she’s talking about. Then begin asking things like: Are there more than one article to each point? Which has the most recent articles? Which articles feature more solid proof than say the evidence used to prove the 1 in ¾/5/6 women are raped at college stat? You know the one that no real source has ever been found for beyond some congresswoman rattling something off during something or other with no source behind her either. In retrospec this is a very vague tweet. She can say she read studies that say anything she wants but the question becomes, where are the sources? how biased are these studies? Who conducted these studies? -- source link